AI Change Tracker · three-vendor launch

Know what changed.
Check the evidence.

We monitor official OpenAI, Anthropic and Google documentation for pricing, limits, terms, usage policies, deprecations and changelogs. New source changes publish automatically with dated before-and-after excerpts.

31 of 33 sources checked successfully in the latest cycle. Last cycle: 2026-10-25T19:40:28Z. Official sources are checked every two hours. Blocked sources and interpretation holds stay visible. Inspect check health.

Subscribe via RSS · Subscribe to the calendar · Download tracker data

Does it still work?

Follow the consequence of a change through to the advice you use. Each entry keeps vendor announcements, source reviews and actual workflow tests distinct.

This pilot covers 10 advice pages and five named workflows. A test result applies to its stated recipe.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5: Which Should You Use?

Read the advice

Not tested

What changed: Pricing evidence rechecked October 24, 2026: quoted rates and relevant plan terms remain supported. Expired pricing proofs refreshed within the existing policy; the article, original test dates and recorded outputs are unchanged. Production workflows remain untested.

Who it affects: Readers choosing Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Opus 5.5 for a specific job.

Our recommendation: Unchanged. Current official pricing and plan evidence supports the unchanged article. All source dependencies have retained valid scoped evidence and article bindings. Historical tests remain dated observations; production workflows remain untested.

Start with Sonnet 5.5 for well-scoped coding and document work you can check. Try Opus 5.5 for ambiguous or error-sensitive jobs when fewer mistakes justify its higher token price. The October 19 quote example supports that narrow task choice; it does not establish a general model winner. Verify calculations and compare accepted-task cost, retries and review time. Production workflows remain untested.

What to do now: Keep the existing task-based guidance. Verify calculations and include retries and review time when comparing models. No pricing correction, model switch or workflow retest is required because of this documentation edit.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Oct 22, 2026, 15:13 PDT · review due
Kingy tested workflow: Not tested for this recipe

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5: Which Should You Use? Readers choosing Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Opus 5.5 for a specific job.

Earlier recommendation: Start with the model suited to the job; the article labels this as editorial interpretation without a matched Kingy test.

GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Which Is Worth Paying For?

Read the advice

Not tested

What changed: Reviewed the OpenAI pricing and cache-policy source changes: image-model pricing rows were removed and cache data-handling documentation was added. Neither required a correction to this comparison. Expired pricing evidence and the cache-policy proof were refreshed; the recommendation, article, original test dates and outputs remain unchanged. Production workflows remain untested.

Who it affects: Readers choosing GPT-6 Astra or GPT-6.1 Sol; API costs and Codex access remain distinct.

Our recommendation: Unchanged. The exact OpenAI pricing and cache-policy diffs require no article correction. Current scoped source evidence supports the unchanged recommendation, including refreshed pricing and cache-policy proofs. Historical tests remain dated observations; production workflows remain untested.

Start with Sol 6.1 for repeatable work you can verify; choose Astra when it fixes important failures or saves enough review time to cover its higher cost.

What to do now: Use the choose-and-switch guide, inspect the dated October 22 outputs, and compare accepted tasks, retries and review time before switching models.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Oct 22, 2026, 14:55 PDT · review due
Kingy tested workflow: Not tested for this recipe

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Which Is Worth Paying For? Readers choosing GPT-6 Astra or GPT-6.1 Sol; API costs and Codex access remain distinct.

Earlier recommendation: Use task-specific comparisons and current rates to choose a starting model.

Claude Dashboards & Motion: Access, Pricing & Setup

Read the advice

Not tested

What changed: Enrolled for repeat checks; no new vendor change is asserted by enrollment.

Who it affects: Claude users checking Dashboards or Motion beta access, plan and setup.

Our recommendation: Under review. Current recommendation review is incomplete for the stated scope.

What to do now: Confirm the beta is available in your account and retain your current workflow until its replacement is tested.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Full-scope review not established
Kingy tested workflow: Not tested for this recipe

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in Claude Dashboards & Motion: Access, Pricing & Setup. Claude users checking Dashboards or Motion beta access, plan and setup.

Earlier recommendation: Check feature eligibility and setup for the specific Claude interface.

ChatGPT Pro 500 vs Pro 200 and Pro 100: Is It Worth It?

Read the advice

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5: Which Should You Use?

Read the advice

Can You Run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017? RAM, GPU, SSD and Rental Costs

Read the advice

Not tested

What changed: The official 1017 weights total 510.30GB. The retained two-B300 attempt failed before inference; the 512GB Mac result comes from a specific third-party conversion.

Who it affects: People considering the exact DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 local artifact on their own hardware.

Our recommendation: Under review. Current recommendation review is incomplete for the stated scope.

What to do now: Check the exact artifact and available memory before downloading weights. The named full-model run has not been executed by this pilot.

Test scope: Load the article’s exact DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 artifact and complete a fixed local generation.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Full-scope review not established
Kingy tested workflow: Not tested for this recipe

The required full-model artifact and admitted hardware environment are unavailable; no weights or rentals were purchased.

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in Can You Run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017? RAM, GPU, SSD and Rental Costs. People considering the exact DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 local artifact on their own hardware.

Earlier recommendation: Audit the named artifact and loader against real memory and storage; retain the article’s estimated versus reported distinction.

Reverse Engineer Anything with AI: REA Tested on a Notes Exporter

Read the advice

Passed

What changed: The published analysis and feature-trace commands and one quoted-comma CSV case also passed on REA 6.7.0. The original 6.0.0 test receipt is retained.

Who it affects: Readers checking the published notes-export commands on REA 6.7.0, alongside the retained 6.0.0 baseline.

Our recommendation: Under review. Current recommendation review is incomplete for the stated scope.

What to do now: The same analysis and feature-trace commands and one CSV case passed on 6.7.0. Use the exact recorded version; the original 14-case test and reconstruction remain tied to 6.0.0.

Test scope: REA 6.7.0 static analysis and feature trace of the public notes example, plus the published CSV reconstruction acceptance case.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Full-scope review not established
Kingy tested workflow: Oct 19, 2026, 17:32 PDT

Pinned REA 6.7.0 only. This rerun covers the static analysis/trace and one published CSV acceptance case; it does not repeat all 14 historical cases, launch Electron, test opaque native applications, or perform a new AI reconstruction.

Inspect the executed test receipt

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in Reverse Engineer Anything with AI: REA Tested on a Notes Exporter. Readers checking the published notes-export commands on REA 6.7.0, alongside the retained 6.0.0 baseline.

Earlier recommendation: Reproduce the pinned notes-export example as a bounded starting point; newer releases require separate tests.

Blender with OpenAI Astra: The Complete Guide to Creating 3D Models, Animations, Product Visuals, and Virtual Worlds

Read the advice

Retest pending

What changed: GPT-5.5 ChatGPT/Work/Codex retirement notice; API excluded documentation changed

Who it affects: Readers rebuilding the article’s downloadable Blender product starter through its manual command-line route.

Our recommendation: Under review. Current recommendation review is incomplete for the stated scope.

What to do now: Rebuild the starter in a new output directory, then inspect the preview. This receipt covers the published builder, not Astra prompting or MCP setup.

Test scope: Rebuild and render the downloadable Blender product starter using the article’s manual CLI route.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Full-scope review not established
Kingy tested workflow: Oct 19, 2026, 17:10 PDT

The existing published builder was executed. Astra prompting, MCP setup, other starter scenes and general visual quality are outside this test.

Inspect the executed test receipt

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in Blender with OpenAI Astra: The Complete Guide to Creating 3D Models, Animations, Product Visuals, and Virtual Worlds. Readers rebuilding the article’s downloadable Blender product starter through its manual command-line route.

Earlier recommendation: Use the downloadable builder and inspect its editable scene and preview before extending it.

How to Run MiniMax H3 Locally in ComfyUI: Complete Setup Guide

Read the advice

Not tested

What changed: Enrolled for repeat checks; no new vendor change is asserted by enrollment.

Who it affects: People attempting MiniMax H3-Base locally through the named ComfyUI recipe.

Our recommendation: Under review. Current recommendation review is incomplete for the stated scope.

What to do now: Confirm the ComfyUI version, model artifacts and device compatibility first. This pilot has not downloaded or run the model.

Test scope: Execute the guide’s MiniMax H3-Base ComfyUI text-to-video recipe.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Full-scope review not established
Kingy tested workflow: Not tested for this recipe

The named ComfyUI/model environment is unavailable. Downloading large weights or renting a GPU has not been authorized.

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in How to Run MiniMax H3 Locally in ComfyUI: Complete Setup Guide. People attempting MiniMax H3-Base locally through the named ComfyUI recipe.

Earlier recommendation: Use the documented native ComfyUI route and retain the guide’s source-reported versus Kingy-tested distinction.

How to Make Motion Graphics With Astra in Codex: A Practical Prompt Guide

Read the advice

Not tested

What changed: Enrolled for repeat checks; no new vendor change is asserted by enrollment.

Who it affects: Readers following the Astra-in-Codex motion-graphics prompt workflow.

Our recommendation: Under review. Current recommendation review is incomplete for the stated scope.

What to do now: Validate the named model, installed renderer and acceptance criteria on a small job; this pilot has not executed the Astra prompting workflow.

Test scope: Execute the article’s Astra-in-Codex prompt-to-motion-graphics workflow.

Vendor announced: Not established
Kingy checked source: Full-scope review not established
Kingy tested workflow: Not tested for this recipe

No new Astra model session or paid execution was initiated. Static page checks are not a substitute for this workflow test.

Scope, earlier recommendation and sources

Current advice in How to Make Motion Graphics With Astra in Codex: A Practical Prompt Guide. Readers following the Astra-in-Codex motion-graphics prompt workflow.

Earlier recommendation: Develop a direction and representative frame before a full render.

Verified-advice pageview measurement starts 2026-10-20. Source-reviewed reach and workflow-tested reach are measured separately. Inspect pilot evidence.

Vendor Search

Observed source changes

A page edit establishes a documented change. Actual account limits, enforcement and legal meaning may require further evidence.

OpenAIdeprecation