AI Tool Profile

GitHub Copilot

GitHub introduced an asynchronous coding agent for GitHub Copilot, embedded in GitHub and accessible from VS Code.

Kingy AI Product Facts

GitHub Copilot

Current statusUnknown

Company
Not yet reviewed
Primary job
AI coding assistance that helps people write code faster and with less effort.
Audience
Not yet reviewed
Free plan
Available
Evidence
Source-backed; coverage expanding
Coverage
9 of 87 core fields recorded
Sources
2
Latest source check
September 6, 2026
See all tracked product factsPricing, platforms, dependencies, data claims, regions, and timeline

Plans and pricing units

  • Pro 10 · USD · user

Where it runs

Availability
Not yet reviewed

Stack and integrations

Model / provider dependencies
Not yet reviewed
Integrations
Not yet reviewed

Data and regions

Vendor data-use claim
Not yet reviewed
Vendor retention claim
Not yet reviewed
Regions
Not yet reviewed

Launch and latest material update

Launch
Not yet reviewed
Latest material update
Not yet reviewed
Review history
  1. GitHub Copilot — Product Facts updated

    Kingy published an approved change to this Product Facts record.

    View published revision
Technical evidence and revision history
Embed “Facts tracked by Kingy”

This label is not a security certification, audit, or product endorsement. It reports the facts Kingy currently supports and when they were last checked.

Warning: This is not a general GitHub Copilot pricing guide. It covers only the legacy annual Pro/Pro+ boundary in the cited source.

Answer first: GitHub’s cited request page applies only to legacy annual Copilot Pro and Pro+ subscribers who remained on request-based billing after June 1, 2026.

What this page establishes

Premium request use can vary by feature and model; do not generalize this page to every Copilot account or current plan.

What it does not establish

This is a billing-boundary explainer, not a pricing recommendation or usage estimate.

FAQ

Is this a recommendation?

No. This is source-bound editorial context; selection needs a task, account, data, permission, cost and human-review boundary.

What should be tested before adoption?

Use a disposable or approved environment, record product/version/account, define allowed tools and data, inspect diffs and logs, and keep a human approval step.

Sources, testing and correction

Primary source: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing/request-based-billing-legacy/copilot-requests.
Testing limit: Kingy has not created an account, connected a repository, submitted code, run a model, benchmarked output, or tested security.
Correction: replace only the affected claim with dated primary evidence; retain the prior source and correction note.

Current plan check

As observed on 2026-09-06, GitHub lists Copilot Free for individuals and lists Copilot Pro at US$10 per user per month. These individual-plan statements do not establish access, limits, or billing for every Copilot agent feature or organization policy.

Source: GitHub Copilot plans (retained successful capture: 2026-09-06T03:13:08.000Z).

Launch History

AI Agents

GitHub Copilot Chat agent-session search

GitHub updated Copilot Chat so it can search and query past Copilot cloud agent sessions in chat.

Recheck due Free: Unknown API: Unknown Open: No
Clear use caseVideo demo
Launch readiness
6.5 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-12.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

GitHub updated Copilot Chat to search and query past Copilot cloud agent sessions, per the June 10, 2026 changelog (github.blog). Developers and Engineering Teams…

AI Coding Tools

GitHub Copilot CLI security review command

GitHub added a dedicated security review command to Copilot CLI.

Recheck due Free: Unknown API: Unknown Open: No
Clear use caseVideo demo
Launch readiness
6.7 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-12.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

GitHub added a dedicated security review command to Copilot CLI in its June 10, 2026 changelog (github.blog). Developers and Security-Minded Engineering Teams get an…

AI Coding Tools

GitHub Copilot coding agent

GitHub introduced an asynchronous coding agent for GitHub Copilot, embedded in GitHub and accessible from VS Code.

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: No
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal

Important because distribution inside GitHub may matter more than standalone agent novelty for enterprise adoption.

AI Coding Tools

Introducing GitHub Copilot Extensions

GitHub introduced Copilot Extensions so partners and developer tools could connect into Copilot Chat experiences.

Recheck due Free: No API: Yes Open: No
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal
Launch readiness
6.5 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

GitHub introduced Copilot Extensions so partners and developer tools could connect into Copilot Chat (github.blog). Developers, DevOps Teams, and Enterprises got an early view…