Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5

API price, context window and output limit for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 5.5 from Kingy's checked data, and what common workloads cost on each. Every price shows when Kingy last checked it.

At a glance

Verdict: Kingy cannot confirm both prices right now. In Kingy's tests, Kimi K3.1 Pro passed 20/20 on Kingy's coding and data tasks, Claude Opus 5.5 16/20.

MeasureKimi K3.1 ProClaude Opus 5.5
ProviderMoonshot AIAnthropic
API priceNot confirmed right now. Check the official page$4 in / $20 outCached input $0.2per 1M tokens, USD
Context window1.05M tokens1M tokens
Max outputNot listed128K tokens
Availability—Available (listed as current in official docs)
RetirementNone listed in Kingy AI DeadlinesNone listed in Kingy AI Deadlines
Price checkRead automatically, not human-reviewedChecked Nov 12, 05:23 UTCHuman-reviewedChecked Nov 13, 01:10 UTC
Official sourcesplatform.kimi.ai › chatplatform.claude.com › pricing
platform.claude.com › overview
platform.claude.com › prompt-caching

Larger is not always better: a bigger context window or output limit only matters if your work needs it. These figures compare price and limits, not answer quality.

What common workloads cost

At 10,000 requests a month, standard list rates. Change the numbers in the tool below for your own usage.

MeasureKimi K3.1 ProClaude Opus 5.5
Chat reply2,000 in / 500 outPrice not confirmed right now$180 a month$0.02 per request
Coding agent step30,000 in / 2,000 outPrice not confirmed right now$1,600 a month$0.16 per request
Long document summary150,000 in / 1,500 outPrice not confirmed right now$6,300 a month$0.63 per request
Classify short text300 in / 20 outPrice not confirmed right now$16.00 a month$0.0016 per request

Excludes prompt-cache discounts, batch and priority pricing, regional rates, tool fees and tax. Reasoning tokens count as output, so a model that thinks longer costs more per request than these figures show.

What Kingy measured

Kingy's own runs, not vendor claims. These are small tests: read each one for its tasks and limits before generalising. All results are also on the AI Model Board.

TestKimi K3.1 ProClaude Opus 5.5
AI Accuracy Index: 125 official figures from memory, 2 asks eachNot tested by KingyRight 60%, wrong 8.4%, not sure 32%2026-11-10 · read the test
Kingy's four coding and data tasks, 5 tries each20/20 passed · Kingy's bill $0.065152026-11-09 · read the test16/20 passed · Kingy's bill $0.184862026-11-09 · read the test

More from Kingy on these models

Compare other models

Loading Kingy's price data…

Prices of other AI models

See the checked prices of all the main AI models in one table, or pick any two models in the tool above.

How this works

Prices come from the same checked data behind Kingy's AI cost calculator and the Kingy Facts API. OpenAI, Anthropic and Google prices are reviewed by a person and re-checked against the official pricing page every few hours. Prices for other providers are read automatically from their official pricing pages by fixed rules, and the table says so.

"Not confirmed right now" means Kingy could not confirm the price within its check window, so it shows no number. Use the official link instead. Retirement dates come from Kingy AI Deadlines. Every source re-check is logged in the public accuracy ledger.

Why isn't my model listed?

Only models with a tracked official price page are listed. Embedding, rerank and moderation models are left out because they have no output price to compare.

Does this show benchmarks?

It shows Kingy's own tests when a model has been through them: the AI Accuracy Index and Kingy's coding and data tasks. These are small tests, so read each one for its tasks and limits before generalising. Vendor benchmarks are left out, because results depend on the test and settings used; Kingy's full comparisons cover them when one exists for your pair.

Kingy's full comparisons