Skip to main content

Verified AI Launch Intelligence

See what launched, what changed, and what it costs.

Track AI product launches, model updates, pricing changes and tested workflows. Each record separates official sources, company claims, Kingy testing and third-party evidence so you can see what is known and what remains unverified.

Editorial submissions and sponsor-fit reviews are separate. Payment does not influence Kingy scores, verdicts, rankings, evidence labels, or publication decisions.

Launch tracker

Browse the AI Launch Tracker

Search source-backed launch records, then use common filters first and advanced filters only when you need a narrower view.

Server-rendered fallback. Checking the live launch index…
Showing 1–18 of 36 launches
AI Agents

OpenAI Presence managed enterprise agents

Each deployment begins with a defined job and limited access to the knowledge and systems required for that job. Companies set policies, approved actions, and escalation conditions. Simulations…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: Unknown
Clear use caseBusiness-friendly

OpenAI Presence addresses a concrete need: The launch packages agent design, deployment controls, operational evaluation, and post-launch improvement into one managed enterprise offering rather…

AI Agents

Rex governed agents for order-to-cash work

Rex launched a set of governed AI agents for collections, customer-portal work, accounts-receivable inboxes, cash application, and dispute handling.

Recheck due Free: No API: Unknown Open: Unknown
Clear use caseBusiness-friendly

Rex addresses a concrete need: Order-to-cash work crosses inboxes, finance systems, and customer portals, making it a useful test of whether agentic software can…

AI Agents

Creed portable Markdown context for AI agents

Creed launched a portable Markdown-based context file that gives supported AI agents a user-controlled record of preferences, projects, and working style.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Unknown Open: Yes
Clear use caseBeginner-friendlyBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

Creed addresses a concrete need: Users increasingly move among several assistants, while the context each one learns usually stays trapped in a product. The…

AI Agents

Deck AI chief of staff with a delegated inbox

Deck launched an AI chief of staff with its own inbox, letting a user copy selected email threads, assign follow-up work, and schedule recurring routines without granting full…

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Unknown Open: Unknown
Clear use caseBeginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly

Deck addresses a concrete need: Giving an assistant its own inbox offers a narrower permission model than granting access to an entire mailbox, while…

AI Agents

Lunen enterprise agent orchestration layer

Lunen.ai launched an early-access enterprise orchestration layer for defining agents in plain language and governing their tools, data access, approvals, schedules, and audit trails.

Recheck due Free: Unknown API: Yes Open: Unknown
Clear use caseBusiness-friendly

Lunen.ai addresses a concrete need: Enterprises experimenting with agents need controls at the action layer, not only prompt guidelines. The main limitation is this:…

AI Agents

Fuzzy AI relationship-first sales workspace

Fuzzy AI launched a relationship-first sales workspace that combines prospect research, LinkedIn engagement, personalized outreach, sequencing, and human-reviewed replies.

Recheck due Free: No API: Unknown Open: Unknown
Clear use caseBeginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly

Fuzzy AI addresses a concrete need: Fuzzy reflects a shift from high-volume AI prospecting toward systems that try to coordinate research, public engagement, and…

AI Agents

Skippr embeddable real-time product agent

Skippr AI launched an embeddable real-time agent that can speak with users, understand an application's context, demonstrate workflows, and operate the product with approval controls.

Recheck due Free: No API: Yes Open: Unknown
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

Skippr AI addresses a concrete need: Skippr represents a product-interface trend in which software companies embed an agent that can demonstrate and operate the…

AI Agents

GitHub Copilot for Jira reaches GA: June 25, 2026 launch record

GitHub Copilot for Jira reached general availability, adding real-time Copilot cloud-agent progress inside Jira, post-session steering and simplified onboarding for connected GitHub repositories.

Recheck due Free: No API: Unknown Open: No
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

The GA release closes useful workflow gaps by returning agent progress and follow-up control to Jira. The integration also moves ticket context into a…

AI Agents

Genspark.ai Series B extension funding announcement

Genspark announced a $100 million Series B extension that it says brought the round to $485 million at a $2.6 billion post-money valuation, alongside a chief revenue officer…

Recheck due Free: Yes API: No Open: No
Clear use caseVideo demoBeginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly

The extension increases Genspark’s stated capacity to pursue enterprise distribution, but capital raised is not product validation. The funding, valuation, ARR, investor, model-count and…

AI Agents

CrowdStrike Continuous Identity for AI Agents

CrowdStrike announced Continuous Identity for AI Agents, a Falcon Next-Gen Identity Security capability intended to give agents verifiable workload identities and authorize each action using owner, caller, device-risk…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: No
Clear use caseBusiness-friendly

CrowdStrike’s continuous-authorization model addresses a real weakness in long-lived agent credentials, and the announcement is unusually specific about owner, caller, device and delegation context.…

AI Agents

OpenAI Partner Network

OpenAI launched a global program for firms that build, sell and deliver AI solutions, with Select, Advanced and Elite tiers, a public partner directory, planned specializations and a…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: No
Clear use caseBeginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly

The Partner Network gives enterprises a more structured way to discover OpenAI-focused delivery firms and gives partners clearer tiers and program infrastructure. A directory…

AI Agents

OpenAI Ona Acquisition for Codex

OpenAI announced an agreement to acquire Ona, subject to customary closing conditions, with the stated intent to bring Ona’s secure, persistent, customer-controlled cloud execution and orchestration technology into…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: No
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

Ona gives OpenAI a credible route toward persistent, governed execution for Codex, but the announcement is a transaction and product-direction statement, not proof that…

AI Agents

Replit SEO Agent launches to improve web and AI-search discoverability

Replit introduced SEO Agent, which scans published apps, identifies discoverability issues, and can apply fixes for web search and AI search visibility.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: No Open: No
Clear use caseVideo demoBeginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly
Launch readiness
6.4 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Replit introduced SEO Agent, which scans published apps, flags discoverability issues, and can apply fixes for web and AI search visibility (replit.com). Replit Builders…

AI Agents

CoSupport AI 2.0 adds decision logs and action-capable support workflows

CoSupport says version 2.0 replaces its earlier single-pass retrieval flow with multi-step search and validation. The update adds per-reply decision logs, an Agentic API for actions in connected…

Unknown Free: No API: Yes Open: No
Product Hunt tractionClear use caseBusiness-friendlyTraction signal

Watch. CoSupport AI 2.0 is a substantive operations-focused update, particularly for teams that need decision visibility and actions through Shopify or Stripe. Its performance,…

AI Agents

Vibe gets to work.

Mistral AI relaunched Le Chat as Vibe, a unified agent for long-horizon work and coding with Work Mode, Code Mode, VS Code support, CLI updates, and mobile access.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Yes Open: No
Clear use caseVideo demoBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendly
Launch readiness
7.1 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Mistral relaunched Le Chat as Vibe, a unified agent for long-horizon work and coding with Work Mode, Code Mode, VS Code support, CLI updates,…

AI Agents

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.8 with improved coding, agentic task performance, professional work quality, effort controls, and Claude Code dynamic workflows.

Recheck due Free: No API: Yes Open: No
Clear use caseVideo demoBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendly
Launch readiness
7.9 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.8 with improved coding, agentic task performance, effort controls, and Claude Code dynamic workflows, priced at $5 per million input…

AI Agents

Cohere launches Command A+ as an open-source model for agentic enterprise workflows

Cohere released Command A+ as an Apache 2.0 open-source MoE model optimized for reasoning, multilingual, multimodal, RAG, and agentic workflows.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Yes Open: Yes
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal
Launch readiness
7.2 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Cohere released Command A+ as an Apache 2.0 open-source MoE model built for reasoning, multilingual, multimodal, RAG, and agentic enterprise workflows (cohere.com). Developers, Enterprises,…

AI Agents

Advancing voice intelligence with new models in the API

OpenAI released GPT-Realtime-2, GPT-Realtime-Translate, and GPT-Realtime-Whisper for realtime voice reasoning, translation, and streaming transcription in the API.

Recheck due Free: No API: Yes Open: No
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal

A high-signal API launch because it moves voice AI toward realtime agents that can reason, translate, transcribe, and act during a conversation.

Daily radar

Latest verified AI launches

A Radar edition publishes only when the day has enough source-ready signal; the tracker continues to show the newest verified records.

No source-ready records are tagged for today yet, so this section is showing the latest public launch records available in the tracker.

AI Models

GPT-6 Sol

Summary: OpenAI added GPT-6 Sol to the API as gpt-6-sol and began rolling it out in ChatGPT Work and Codex to eligible paid plans on September 22,…

Why it matters: GPT-6 Sol merits a workload-specific trial when Astra costs more than the task warrants. Kingy's September 22 comparison finds lower cost per task on…

Pricing
OpenAI lists standard direct API rates of US$2 per million input tokens and US$10 per million output tokens for requests with at most 272K input tokens, checked September 22, 2026. Longer context, caching and processing tiers have different rates; consult the official model pricing.
Verification
Source-verified; 3 sources
AI Models

GPT-6 Astra

Summary: OpenAI announced GPT-6 Astra on September 3, 2026. Its release describes a staged rollout to ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise, the OpenAI API, Microsoft Azure…

Why it matters: Astra is worth evaluating for complex coding, research and computer-use workflows where a failed step is expensive. Its documented tool support is useful, but…

Pricing
OpenAI Standard API rates per million tokens are $10 input, $1 cached input, $12.50 cache writes and $50 output. Above 272,000 input tokens, the full request costs 2× input/cache rates and 1.5× output. Batch/Flex use 50% of Standard rates; Fast uses 2× applicable rates. Tool fees can add to token charges.
Verification
Source-verified; 3 sources
AI Hardware

RayNeo iO

Summary: Announced August 21, 2026, RayNeo iO is now orderable on the official USD storefront. RayNeo says the Polar Night version is expected to begin shipping gradually…

Why it matters: Paid coverage: RayNeo paid Kingy for the September 9 video. No affiliate compensation, supplied product or access, or other benefit was received. Work began…

Pricing
Vendor price checked September 12, 2026: the official USD store lists iO from $449, with a displayed regular price from $499. RayNeo AI and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite are included free with the product; optional access to other AI models costs US$9.99/month. Confirm the selected variant, destination, accessories, taxes and dispatch estimate at checkout.
Verification
Recheck due; 3 sources
AI Marketing

Attentive AI Grow

Summary: Attentive announced the general availability of AI Grow on August 19, 2026. The product analyzes browsing and shopping behavior among identified and logged-out visitors to decide…

Why it matters: AI Grow is a commercially relevant launch because it applies AI to an established subscriber-acquisition workflow, is generally available, and is measured with cohort-level…

Pricing
Attentive does not publish AI Grow list pricing in the reviewed launch materials. The product is available to Attentive customers through a sales or demo path.
Verification
Recheck due; 2 sources
Enterprise AI

WethosAI Twins

Summary: WethosAI launched Twins on August 18, 2026 as part of its Human Context Platform. The company says organizations can use the capability through its SaaS product,…

Why it matters: Twins is an intriguing enterprise decision-rehearsal launch because WethosAI states explicit permission, access-control, and non-impersonation boundaries. The vendor has not published independent predictive-validity evidence…

Pricing
Public list pricing was not disclosed in the reviewed launch materials. WethosAI offers a request-a-briefing or demo path for the SaaS platform and enterprise/API use.
Verification
Recheck due; 3 sources
AI Infrastructure

Cerebras CS-4

Summary: Cerebras introduced CS-4 on August 18, 2026. The company describes a redesigned rack-scale system using three WSE-3 Turbo processors, a modular Nexus platform, native disaggregated-inference support,…

Why it matters: Cerebras CS-4 is a consequential AI-infrastructure launch with a concrete shipment window and architectural changes beyond a processor refresh. Its headline speed, throughput, and…

Pricing
Public list pricing was not disclosed in the reviewed launch sources. Cerebras directs buyers to contact sales, and the company says first shipments begin this quarter.
Verification
Recheck due; 3 sources

Plan ahead

Upcoming Deadlines

Future-dated migration, shutdown, and retirement records are separated from today's launches and latest-record lists. These dates are upcoming operational events, not launches that have already happened.

AI Agents

OpenAI Agent Builder shutdown deadline: November 30, 2026

Summary: OpenAI announced the Agent Builder lifecycle deadline: the visual workflow builder is deprecated and scheduled to shut down on November 30, 2026. OpenAI documents two migration…

Why it matters: Export the workflow, select the Agents SDK or a suitable Workspace Agent, and test tools, state, permissions and guardrails before the November 30 shutdown.…

Pricing
Review replacement API costs or Workspace Agent plan requirements before migrating. This record does not estimate your workflow’s implementation or operating cost.
Verification
Source-verified; 3 sources
AI Developer Tools

Three GPT Image API models are scheduled to retire December 1, 2026

Summary: OpenAI announced an API lifecycle deadline for gpt-image-1-mini, gpt-image-1.5 and chatgpt-image-latest. Those model IDs are scheduled to shut down on December 1, 2026, with gpt-image-2 listed…

Why it matters: OpenAI schedules gpt-image-1-mini, gpt-image-1.5 and chatgpt-image-latest for API removal on December 1, 2026. Its deprecation table names gpt-image-2 as the replacement. Inventory the three…

Pricing
Review the current price of the chosen replacement and measure representative jobs. This lifecycle record does not establish workload cost or promise a cost-neutral migration.
Verification
Source-verified; 5 sources
Explore launch categories, methodology and participation Awards archive, category paths, methodology, submissions, sponsorship and newsletter

Awards archive

Launches of the Week is paused

Prior editions remain available as an archive. Kingy is not currently promising a new weekly awards edition.

Category navigation

Find AI launches by market, workflow, and source signal

Methodology

How Kingy AI Scores Launches

Kingy AI scoring is designed for launch discovery, editorial review, creator planning, and buyer trust checks.

Kingy score

A directional editorial score for launch clarity, source quality, audience fit, pricing visibility, demo usefulness, and practical buyer or creator value.

Demo score

A signal for whether the product can be shown, tested, explained, or compared without relying on vague announcement copy.

YouTube potential

A creator-fit signal for demos, tutorials, before-and-after workflows, explainers, reviews, and audience-specific product education.

Source verification

Records distinguish verified, needs verification, and founder submitted status using official URLs, source links, last-verified dates, and correction paths.

Pricing clarity

Pricing signals favor launches with visible pricing, free-plan status, pricing pages, API access notes, or clear uncertainty when pricing is not public.

Use-case clarity

Launches are easier to evaluate when the audience, workflow, category, demo, and alternative comparison are obvious from public sources.

Founder and sponsor fit

Founder submissions and sponsor interest are routing signals only; editorial review still checks source quality, public claims, demo clarity, and usefulness.

Verification labels

Verified means enough public source evidence is present, needs verification means the record needs more checking, and founder submitted means the entry came through the submission path.

Scores are editorial signals, not scientific benchmarks, paid placements, or guarantees.

Founder submission

Submit Your AI Launch

Founders can send a launch for editorial review when the public source trail is ready to verify.

What to include

  • Product name
  • Website
  • Launch date
  • What launched
  • Official source links
  • Pricing page
  • Demo/video
  • Company info
  • Category
  • Public funding info
  • Screenshots/media

Privacy note

Do not submit secrets, unreleased financials, private customer data, or regulated personal data.

Submit only public product, company, source, pricing, demo, and media details that Kingy AI can review without logging into private systems.

Sponsor path

Sponsor Kingy AI launch coverage

Launching an AI product that needs clear demos, creator education, and buyer trust? Sponsor a Kingy AI video or launch feature.

Brief status

The Kingy Brief

Proof Lab 01 is available as a one-off pilot. Regular email sending remains paused. Read the pilot and archive, or sign up for future editions. No recurring schedule is promised.