Skip to main content

Verified AI Launch Intelligence

See what launched, what changed, and what it costs.

Track AI product launches, model updates, pricing changes and tested workflows. Each record separates official sources, company claims, Kingy testing and third-party evidence so you can see what is known and what remains unverified.

Editorial submissions and sponsor-fit reviews are separate. Payment does not influence Kingy scores, verdicts, rankings, evidence labels, or publication decisions.

Launch tracker

Browse the AI Launch Tracker

Search source-backed launch records, then use common filters first and advanced filters only when you need a narrower view.

Server-rendered fallback. Checking the live launch index…
Showing 1–18 of 36 launches
AI Agents

OpenAI Presence managed enterprise agents

Each deployment begins with a defined job and limited access to the knowledge and systems required for that job. Companies set policies, approved actions, and escalation conditions. Simulations…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: Unknown
Business-friendly

OpenAI Presence addresses a concrete need: The launch packages agent design, deployment controls, operational evaluation, and post-launch improvement into one managed enterprise offering rather…

AI Agents

Rex governed agents for order-to-cash work

Rex launched a set of governed AI agents for collections, customer-portal work, accounts-receivable inboxes, cash application, and dispute handling.

Recheck due Free: No API: Unknown Open: Unknown
Business-friendly

Rex addresses a concrete need: Order-to-cash work crosses inboxes, finance systems, and customer portals, making it a useful test of whether agentic software can…

AI Agents

Creed portable Markdown context for AI agents

Creed launched a portable Markdown-based context file that gives supported AI agents a user-controlled record of preferences, projects, and working style.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Unknown Open: Yes
Beginner-friendlyBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

Creed addresses a concrete need: Users increasingly move among several assistants, while the context each one learns usually stays trapped in a product. The…

AI Agents

Deck AI chief of staff with a delegated inbox

Deck launched an AI chief of staff with its own inbox, letting a user copy selected email threads, assign follow-up work, and schedule recurring routines without granting full…

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Unknown Open: Unknown
Beginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly

Deck addresses a concrete need: Giving an assistant its own inbox offers a narrower permission model than granting access to an entire mailbox, while…

AI Agents

Lunen enterprise agent orchestration layer

Lunen.ai launched an early-access enterprise orchestration layer for defining agents in plain language and governing their tools, data access, approvals, schedules, and audit trails.

Recheck due Free: Unknown API: Yes Open: Unknown
Business-friendly

Lunen.ai addresses a concrete need: Enterprises experimenting with agents need controls at the action layer, not only prompt guidelines. The main limitation is this:…

AI Agents

Fuzzy AI relationship-first sales workspace

Fuzzy AI launched a relationship-first sales workspace that combines prospect research, LinkedIn engagement, personalized outreach, sequencing, and human-reviewed replies.

Recheck due Free: No API: Unknown Open: Unknown
Beginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly

Fuzzy AI addresses a concrete need: Fuzzy reflects a shift from high-volume AI prospecting toward systems that try to coordinate research, public engagement, and…

AI Agents

Skippr embeddable real-time product agent

Skippr AI launched an embeddable real-time agent that can speak with users, understand an application's context, demonstrate workflows, and operate the product with approval controls.

Recheck due Free: No API: Yes Open: Unknown
Business-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

Skippr AI addresses a concrete need: Skippr represents a product-interface trend in which software companies embed an agent that can demonstrate and operate the…

AI Agents

GitHub Copilot for Jira reaches GA: June 25, 2026 launch record

GitHub Copilot for Jira reached general availability, adding real-time Copilot cloud-agent progress inside Jira, post-session steering and simplified onboarding for connected GitHub repositories.

Recheck due Free: No API: Unknown Open: No
Business-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

The GA release closes useful workflow gaps by returning agent progress and follow-up control to Jira. The integration also moves ticket context into a…

AI Agents

Genspark.ai Series B extension funding announcement

Genspark announced a $100 million Series B extension that it says brought the round to $485 million at a $2.6 billion post-money valuation, alongside a chief revenue officer…

Recheck due Free: Yes API: No Open: No
Beginner-friendlyBusiness-friendlyTraction signalFunding

The extension increases Genspark’s stated capacity to pursue enterprise distribution, but capital raised is not product validation. The funding, valuation, ARR, investor, model-count and…

AI Agents

CoSupport AI 2.0 adds decision logs and action-capable support workflows

CoSupport says version 2.0 replaces its earlier single-pass retrieval flow with multi-step search and validation. The update adds per-reply decision logs, an Agentic API for actions in connected…

Unknown Free: No API: Yes Open: No
Clear use caseBusiness-friendlyTraction signal

Watch. CoSupport AI 2.0 is a substantive operations-focused update, particularly for teams that need decision visibility and actions through Shopify or Stripe. Its performance,…

AI Agents

CrowdStrike Continuous Identity for AI Agents

CrowdStrike announced Continuous Identity for AI Agents, a Falcon Next-Gen Identity Security capability intended to give agents verifiable workload identities and authorize each action using owner, caller, device-risk…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: No
Business-friendly

CrowdStrike’s continuous-authorization model addresses a real weakness in long-lived agent credentials, and the announcement is unusually specific about owner, caller, device and delegation context.…

AI Agents

OpenAI Partner Network

OpenAI launched a global program for firms that build, sell and deliver AI solutions, with Select, Advanced and Elite tiers, a public partner directory, planned specializations and a…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: No
Beginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly

The Partner Network gives enterprises a more structured way to discover OpenAI-focused delivery firms and gives partners clearer tiers and program infrastructure. A directory…

AI Agents

OpenAI Ona Acquisition for Codex

OpenAI announced an agreement to acquire Ona, subject to customary closing conditions, with the stated intent to bring Ona’s secure, persistent, customer-controlled cloud execution and orchestration technology into…

Recheck due Free: No API: No Open: No
Business-friendlyDeveloper-friendly

Ona gives OpenAI a credible route toward persistent, governed execution for Codex, but the announcement is a transaction and product-direction statement, not proof that…

AI Agents

Replit SEO Agent launches to improve web and AI-search discoverability

Replit introduced SEO Agent, which scans published apps, identifies discoverability issues, and can apply fixes for web search and AI search visibility.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: No Open: No
Beginner-friendlyBusiness-friendly
Launch readiness
6.4 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Replit introduced SEO Agent, which scans published apps, flags discoverability issues, and can apply fixes for web and AI search visibility (replit.com). Replit Builders…

AI Agents

Vibe gets to work.

Mistral AI relaunched Le Chat as Vibe, a unified agent for long-horizon work and coding with Work Mode, Code Mode, VS Code support, CLI updates, and mobile access.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Yes Open: No
Business-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal
Launch readiness
7.1 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Mistral relaunched Le Chat as Vibe, a unified agent for long-horizon work and coding with Work Mode, Code Mode, VS Code support, CLI updates,…

AI Agents

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.8 with improved coding, agentic task performance, professional work quality, effort controls, and Claude Code dynamic workflows.

Recheck due Free: No API: Yes Open: No
Business-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal
Launch readiness
7.9 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.8 with improved coding, agentic task performance, effort controls, and Claude Code dynamic workflows, priced at $5 per million input…

AI Agents

Cohere launches Command A+ as an open-source model for agentic enterprise workflows

Cohere released Command A+ as an Apache 2.0 open-source MoE model optimized for reasoning, multilingual, multimodal, RAG, and agentic workflows.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Yes Open: Yes
Business-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal
Launch readiness
7.2 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

Cohere released Command A+ as an Apache 2.0 open-source MoE model built for reasoning, multilingual, multimodal, RAG, and agentic enterprise workflows (cohere.com). Developers, Enterprises,…

AI Agents

Advancing voice intelligence with new models in the API

OpenAI released GPT-Realtime-2, GPT-Realtime-Translate, and GPT-Realtime-Whisper for realtime voice reasoning, translation, and streaming transcription in the API.

Recheck due Free: No API: Yes Open: No
Business-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyTraction signal

A high-signal API launch because it moves voice AI toward realtime agents that can reason, translate, transcribe, and act during a conversation.

Daily radar

Latest verified AI launches

A Radar edition publishes only when the day has enough source-ready signal; the tracker continues to show the newest verified records.

No source-ready records are tagged for today yet, so this section is showing the latest public launch records available in the tracker.

AI Models

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Summary: Google launched Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on November 5, 2026, with general availability through the Gemini API and Gemini for business.

Why it matters: Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash gives video teams longer native clips and editing controls. Check the selected output settings and actual billing units before estimating…

Pricing
The announcement lists US$0.07 per second for 720p video. The API changelog separately lists US$12 per million video output tokens. These are different billing units; check the applicable settings and current terms.
Verification
Source-verified; 2 sources
AI Models

GPT-6 Cyber

Summary: OpenAI introduced GPT-6 Cyber on November 5, 2026, with initial API and Codex access for select approved Daybreak Red customers. Wider access is planned.

Why it matters: GPT-6 Cyber is relevant to security teams eligible for Daybreak Red. Confirm approval, permitted use and pricing before planning work around its restricted API…

Pricing
Standard API rates per million tokens are US$20 input, US$2 cached input and US$100 output. Cache writes are US$25 for 30 minutes or US$50 for 12 hours per million tokens. Context length and processing choices can change rates; confirm approved-access terms and the current pricing table.
Verification
Source-verified; 2 sources
AI Models

ChatGPT Images 2.6

Summary: OpenAI released Images 2.6 on November 4, 2026, in ChatGPT and Codex across all subscription tiers, plus Sunburst and Flare API variants.

Why it matters: Images 2.6 expands image workflows across OpenAI products. Compare Sunburst and Flare on your own edits and check API billing separately from subscription limits.

Pricing
API rates per million tokens for both variants: image input US$8, cached image input US$2 and image output US$30; text input US$5 and cached text input US$1.25. Subscription limits and API billing are separate.
Verification
Source-verified; 2 sources
AI Models

Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk) weights

Summary: Mistral made improved Large 4 weights downloadable on October 29, 2026, following its October 6 public preview. The repository documents text and image input, text output,…

Why it matters: Mistral Large 4 gives teams a documented choice between an API and downloadable weights. Evaluate the commercial-license restriction, infrastructure cost and your own task…

Pricing
Mistral's USD model documentation lists $0.70 input, $0.07 cached input and $2.10 output per million tokens. Self-hosting costs are separate.
Verification
Source-verified; 4 sources
AI Developer Tools

GitHub Copilot Fusion

Summary: GitHub announced Copilot Fusion general availability on October 28, 2026, on all Copilot plans in VS Code, the Copilot app, Copilot CLI and JetBrains IDEs. Users…

Why it matters: GitHub Copilot Fusion gives existing Copilot users an orchestration option in supported clients. Confirm your plan’s models and effort settings, monitor credit use and…

Pricing
Each underlying model is billed at its standard rate with no separate Fusion charge. Official docs specify a 30% paid-plan model-cost discount through November 30, 2026. Multiple-model tasks can consume more credits.
Verification
Source-verified; 2 sources
AI Models

Gemini 4 Carbon

Summary: Google announced Gemini 4 Carbon on October 28, 2026. Access starts with a subset of cyber defenders and is to expand gradually to trusted Fairwind partners.…

Why it matters: Gemini 4 Carbon is currently relevant to teams admitted to Google’s controlled cyber-defense rollout. Broader developer, business and consumer access is a future step.…

Pricing
Announced introductory API rates are US$2 per million input tokens and US$10 per million output tokens, with cached input 95% below the input rate. Google lists later rates of US$4 and US$20 after the introductory period, without a confirmed expiry here. These announced rates do not establish a generally callable public API.
Verification
Source-verified; 2 sources

Plan ahead

Upcoming Deadlines

Future-dated migration, shutdown, and retirement records are separated from today's launches and latest-record lists. These dates are upcoming operational events, not launches that have already happened.

AI Agents

OpenAI Agent Builder shutdown deadline: November 30, 2026

Summary: OpenAI announced the Agent Builder lifecycle deadline: the visual workflow builder is deprecated and scheduled to shut down on November 30, 2026. OpenAI documents two migration…

Why it matters: Export the workflow, select the Agents SDK or a suitable Workspace Agent, and test tools, state, permissions and guardrails before the November 30 shutdown.…

Pricing
Review replacement API costs or Workspace Agent plan requirements before migrating. This record does not estimate your workflow’s implementation or operating cost.
Verification
Recheck due; 3 sources
Uncategorized

OpenAI reusable prompt objects and v1/prompts are scheduled to shut down November 30, 2026

Summary: OpenAI announced reusable-prompt deprecation on June 3, 2026. The documented November 30 shutdown covers reusable prompt objects and v1/prompts. Move managed prompt content into application-owned code…

Why it matters: Treat saved OpenAI prompt objects as a migration dependency before November 30. Move their content and variables into application code, then validate the generated…

Pricing
Pricing unknown
Verification
Recheck due; 5 sources
AI Developer Tools

Three GPT Image API models are scheduled to retire December 1, 2026

Summary: OpenAI schedules gpt-image-1-mini, gpt-image-1.5 and chatgpt-image-latest for API removal on December 1, 2026. Its current deprecation table recommends gpt-image-2.5-sunburst or gpt-image-2.5-flare.

Why it matters: OpenAI schedules gpt-image-1-mini, gpt-image-1.5 and chatgpt-image-latest for API removal on December 1, 2026. Its current deprecation table recommends gpt-image-2.5-sunburst or gpt-image-2.5-flare. Inventory the three…

Pricing
Review the current price of the chosen replacement and measure representative jobs. This lifecycle record does not establish workload cost or promise a cost-neutral migration.
Verification
Recheck due; 5 sources
Explore launch categories, methodology and participation Awards archive, category paths, methodology, submissions, sponsorship and newsletter

Awards archive

Launches of the Week is paused

Prior editions remain available as an archive. Kingy is not currently promising a new weekly awards edition.

Category navigation

Find AI launches by market, workflow, and source signal

Methodology

How Kingy AI Scores Launches

Kingy AI scoring is designed for launch discovery, editorial review, creator planning, and buyer trust checks.

Kingy score

A directional editorial score for launch clarity, source quality, audience fit, pricing visibility, demo usefulness, and practical buyer or creator value.

Demo score

A signal for whether the product can be shown, tested, explained, or compared without relying on vague announcement copy.

YouTube potential

A creator-fit signal for demos, tutorials, before-and-after workflows, explainers, reviews, and audience-specific product education.

Source verification

Records distinguish verified, needs verification, and founder submitted status using official URLs, source links, last-verified dates, and correction paths.

Pricing clarity

Pricing signals favor launches with visible pricing, free-plan status, pricing pages, API access notes, or clear uncertainty when pricing is not public.

Use-case clarity

Launches are easier to evaluate when the audience, workflow, category, demo, and alternative comparison are obvious from public sources.

Founder and sponsor fit

Founder submissions and sponsor interest are routing signals only; editorial review still checks source quality, public claims, demo clarity, and usefulness.

Verification labels

Verified means enough public source evidence is present, needs verification means the record needs more checking, and founder submitted means the entry came through the submission path.

Scores are editorial signals, not scientific benchmarks, paid placements, or guarantees.

Founder submission

Submit Your AI Launch

Founders can send a launch for editorial review when the public source trail is ready to verify.

What to include

  • Product name
  • Website
  • Launch date
  • What launched
  • Official source links
  • Pricing page
  • Demo/video
  • Company info
  • Category
  • Public funding info
  • Screenshots/media

Privacy note

Do not submit secrets, unreleased financials, private customer data, or regulated personal data.

Submit only public product, company, source, pricing, demo, and media details that Kingy AI can review without logging into private systems.

Sponsor path

Sponsor Kingy AI launch coverage

Launching an AI product that needs clear demos, creator education, and buyer trust? Sponsor a Kingy AI video or launch feature.

Brief

Inside The Kingy Brief

Fridays at 09:00 Vancouver time: source-checked AI changes, original tests and one practical thing to try. We skip a week when there is not enough verified material. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Models Agents & harnesses Developer infrastructure Products Funding & company moves Pricing watch Under the radar