Breakthrough Tracker record
ContactSeek uses AlphaFold3 contact predictions to improve base-editor specificity
ContactSeek combines experimentally mapped off-target sites with AlphaFold3 contact probabilities to identify specificity-determining residues. The authors engineered adenine and cytosine base-editor variants and validated improved specificity with targeted sequencing, genome-wide profiling, R-loop assays and RNA sequencing.
← Back to the filtered Breakthrough Tracker
- Stable ID
science-2026-contactseek-base-editor-specificity- Revision
science-2026-contactseek-base-editor-specificity.v1- Field
- Biology and Biotechnology · AI-assisted genome editing
- Evidence
- Tier 2 · Peer reviewed: Yes
- Record state
- Current · Peer-reviewed experimental result
- Last checked
AI role
AlphaFold3 predictions are a substantive part of the ContactSeek method. The authors combined those predictions with experimentally measured off-target signals and laboratory validation; the article does not present model output alone as proof.
Record details
- Problem or result
- Finding mutations that reduce CRISPR base-editor off-target activity without sacrificing useful on-target editing
- Authors
- Haowei Meng, Zhixin Lei, Yongchang Yan, Liren Wang, Chengqi Yi et al.
- Institutions
- Peking University, East China Normal University, AI for Science Institute and collaborators
- Result date
- Published July 22, 2026
Why it matters
The work turns a structure-prediction model into an experimentally tested guide for engineering more selective genome editors, addressing a central safety constraint in base editing.
Limits
The reported editors were evaluated in laboratory systems, including human cells, rather than in a clinical trial. AlphaFold3 ranked candidate contact changes, but experiments established the editing outcomes. Generality beyond the tested Cas9, Cas12a and deaminase systems remains to be shown.
Sources
- Primary: Nature, Precise DNA base editing using AlphaFold3-based contact modelling
- Primary: ContactSeek v1.0.0 archived code
Correction and revision history
- 2026-07-23 — Added after checking the final Nature article, peer-review record, released code, experimental validation and nonclinical scope.
Machine-readable: JSON v1 · CSV v1 · Schema v1
This individual record remains noindex until a story-specific featured image passes Kingy’s rendered-pixel visual review. The source-linked tracker hub remains the public index.