AI Tool Profile
BrowserAct: Browser Modes, Pricing, Privacy Risks, and Evaluation
BrowserAct gives compatible agents and workflow builders controlled browser sessions, profiles, proxy options, network evidence and human takeover across local and hosted modes.
Before you buy
Best for: Developers and automation teams running authorized, bounded browser tasks with dedicated credentials, retention controls and human approval for consequential actions.
Price: Free local CLI runtime; cloud workflows and optional browser/proxy services use credits
Included: Browser sessions and workflow execution in the selected BrowserAct mode.
Main limits: Cloud workflows and optional services consume credits. Credit Packs require an active subscription and expire at the next monthly reset, including on annual plans. Confirm currency, billing term, credentials and human takeover.
What Kingy showed: Related coverage: BrowserAct: Reusable Web Scrapers, Browser Infrastructure, and Pricing. This review does not treat that article as a new test of this exact model, plan or current release.
Buying details checked 2026-10-23 with region and currency stated above. Historical demonstrations and the broader fact ledger keep their own dates.
Check official plans · See the demonstration and disclosure · Compare these workflows
Coverage describes this profile, not a product score or a current price guarantee.

Kingy AI Product Facts
BrowserAct
Current statusUnknown
- Company
- Not yet reviewed
- Primary job
- Not yet reviewed
- Audience
- Not yet reviewed
- Evidence
- Source-backed; coverage expanding
- Latest source check
- October 23, 2026
See all tracked product factsPricing, platforms, dependencies, data claims, regions, and timeline
Sources and checks
- Coverage
- 1 of 87 tracked fields currently verified
- Sources
- 1
Source-check dates apply to the tracked facts. Editorial updates elsewhere on this page may have a different date.
Plans and pricing units
Not yet structured in this Kingy record.
Where it runs
- Availability
- Not yet reviewed
Stack and integrations
- Model / provider dependencies
- Not yet reviewed
- Integrations
- Not yet reviewed
Data and regions
- Vendor data-use claim
- Not yet reviewed
- Vendor retention claim
- Not yet reviewed
- Regions
- Not yet reviewed
Launch and latest material update
- Launch
- Not yet reviewed
- Latest material update
- Not yet reviewed
Review history
- BrowserAct: Browser Modes, Pricing, Privacy Risks, and Evaluation — Product Facts updated
Kingy published an approved change to this Product Facts record.
View published revision
Who should consider it
Developers and automation teams running authorized, bounded browser tasks with dedicated credentials, retention controls and human approval for consequential actions. BrowserAct gives compatible agents and workflow builders controlled browser sessions, profiles, proxy options, network evidence and human takeover across local and hosted modes.
Plan, price and billing scope
Local CLI execution has no BrowserAct runtime fee; cloud workflows and optional browser/proxy services use credits. The pricing and billing pages reviewed October 26, 2026 distinguish local execution from credit-funded services. The Free plan advertises 200 signup credits for eligible accounts, not a recurring monthly credit grant. The displayed Basic offer is $16/month in the Monthly selection, or $13/month equivalent billed $156 yearly in the Yearly selection, with 10,000 monthly credits; currency code unconfirmed. The local-runtime statement does not establish zero total automation costs. No signup, purchase, workflow run or account-credit test was performed.
Sources for this limited October 26 check: Official pricing, billing or access source · Official pricing, billing or access source
Limits that affect the decision
Cloud tasks, workflow steps and optional browser/proxy services have their own credit meters. Credit Packs require an active subscription and expire at the next monthly credit reset, including on annual billing. The signup grant is conditional and is not a renewable monthly allowance. Confirm the selected currency, billing term and usage rules. Credentials, retention and human takeover still require validation before sensitive tasks.
Sources for this limited October 26 check: Official pricing, billing or access source · Official pricing, billing or access source
What the existing evidence shows
Related coverage: BrowserAct: Reusable Web Scrapers, Browser Infrastructure, and Pricing. This review does not treat that article as a new test of this exact model, plan or current release. Product coverage; original publication date and evidence scope retained. Read the related article.
Sources and buying-review date
Buying review completed October 23, 2026. This is a source-based buying assessment. No paid product test, new generation, checkout or performance benchmark was performed. Vendor descriptions and historical examples remain distinct from independently measured results. The date does not renew the broader canonical fact ledger.
- Official source: www.browseract.com
- Official source: docs.browseract.com
- Official source: www.browseract.com
- Official source: github.com
- Related Kingy coverage
Check the official offer · Compare related options
Earlier profile, sources and dates
This older record retains its original scope. Current buying qualifications above take precedence where terms have changed.
Kingy verdict: BrowserAct combines a hosted workflow product with an agent-oriented browser CLI, isolated sessions, profiles, proxies, trace capture and human takeover. That is a credible toolkit for authorized browser work, but stealth features and reusable profiles make governance part of the product evaluation—not an afterthought. Start with read-only targets, separate credentials by workflow and require confirmation for consequential actions.
What BrowserAct actually offers
BrowserAct’s current documentation separates two surfaces. Agent CLI gives coding agents commands for browser control, sessions, profiles, screenshots and network evidence. The hosted Workflow product provides a visual automation path for repeatable web tasks. Documentation also describes local and remote browser modes, session isolation, managed proxy options, browser profiles, remote assistance and capture of network or HAR-style evidence.
The public BrowserAct skills repository packages instructions for compatible agents and is MIT licensed. That open repository should not be confused with the complete hosted service: managed browsers, proxies, stored workflow configurations and extracted results remain provider-operated services. Buyers should inventory which component runs locally, which data reaches BrowserAct and which credentials are persisted in a profile.
The security and policy boundary
Browser automation can cross from observation into transaction. BrowserAct’s repository describes confirmation gating for sensitive operations and a human-handoff path, both useful design signals. Its terms also put responsibility on customers to follow law, target-site terms and robots policies and restrict unauthorized handling of sensitive personal information. A successful browser action is not evidence that the action was authorized.
The privacy policy says the service can process account information, workflow configurations, extracted data and query logs, with retention depending on the plan and use. Before saving an authenticated browser profile, teams should confirm data region, encryption, deletion, employee access, incident response, sub-processors and whether session recordings or network traces contain secrets. Give separate service accounts to separate jobs; do not let an exploratory agent inherit an employee’s broad browser session.
Pricing and operating cost
BrowserAct meters work with credits and separately prices or meters some browser and proxy resources. The live pricing page is the authority because allowances and unit rates can change. Total cost depends on workflow steps, retries, page volume, browser mode, proxy traffic, profile persistence and the model driving the agent. Test a fixed task pack and record successful outcomes per dollar instead of comparing headline credits alone.
How Kingy would evaluate it
Use a sandbox account and three bounded tasks: collect public product fields, navigate an authenticated test application without changing state, and complete a reversible form only after explicit human approval. Score success, recovery from layout changes, evidence quality, request volume, proxy usage, time, cost and unwanted actions. Compare local and hosted modes under the same task pack.
Then test failure paths: a prompt-injection string on a page, a misleading download, an unexpected login challenge, a revoked credential, cross-session data leakage, proxy-region mismatch, takeover during a pending action and deletion of stored profiles and results. Reconcile logs with the target system. Kingy reviewed the official product, documentation, pricing, repository, terms and privacy policy; we did not run BrowserAct or authorize it against a live account.
Primary sources
The Kingy Brief
Get The Kingy Brief.
AI changes, original tests and one practical thing to try. Fridays at 09:00 Vancouver time.
Free · Double opt-in · Unsubscribe anytime
Sign up for The Kingy Brief on Beehiiv.
Signup help and newsletter schedule
Signup form provided by Beehiiv. After submitting, check your inbox for "Confirm your subscription to The Kingy Brief" and open its confirmation link. Check Spam or Promotions if you cannot find it.
Fridays at 09:00 Vancouver time: source-checked AI changes, original tests and one practical thing to try. We skip a week when there is not enough verified material. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alternatives
Tool Links
Related Kingy Links
Launch History
BrowserAct
BrowserAct launched a browser-automation platform spanning an agent CLI and hosted workflow product, with isolated browser sessions, reusable profiles, proxy options, network evidence and human takeover for compatible…
BrowserAct’s launch combines useful session isolation, agent commands and human takeover, but stealth browsers, proxies and reusable profiles increase both capability and misuse risk.…