AI Tool Profile

DeepSeek-R1

A released reasoning-model family with downloadable weights.

Before you buy

Best for: Technical creators evaluating the demonstrated reasoning model on bounded text or code tasks.

Price: Canada/CAD: C$0 released weights; inference separate

Included: The official model repository provides weights, inference guidance and MIT licensing for the released R1 materials.

Main limits: Full-model hosting is hardware-intensive. Distilled variants can have different upstream terms; current hosted services may use newer models.

What Kingy showed: The recording tries a marble-under-a-glass question and constrained apple-ending sentences in ChatLLM, then compares outputs with o1.

Buying details checked 2026-10-22 with region and currency stated above. Historical demonstrations and the broader fact ledger keep their own dates.

Check official plans · See the demonstration and disclosure · Compare these workflows

Detailed profileSoftwareProfile source check: 2026-06-08

Coverage describes this profile, not a product score or a current price guarantee.

Verification & Sources

Evidence state
Recheck due
Source links
2
Freshness
Needs recheck: checked June 8, 2026
Last updated
October 22, 2026
What this evidence state means
Definition
The claim was previously checked, but its review window expired or a material change may have invalidated it.
Required provenance
The prior evidence and check date are retained, together with the expiry or change signal that triggered recheck.
Owner
Kingy freshness queue owner and assigned editorial reviewer
Freshness rule
This is already outside its freshness rule. It must not be presented as current until reviewed against current evidence.
Disputes and corrections
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record. Kingy editorial reviews the cited evidence, records material corrections, and changes or removes the state when it is not supported.

Key source checks

Suggest a correction

Form submissions, correction notes, score details, URLs, and analytics events may be stored for editorial review, spam prevention, product improvement, and follow-up. Do not submit secrets, unreleased financials, private customer data, or regulated personal data through these forms.

Which plan is worth considering

Canada/CAD: C$0 released weights; inference separate. The official model repository provides weights, inference guidance and MIT licensing for the released R1 materials. This historical small sample is not a general reasoning benchmark or a current DeepSeek API reliability test. The model shown must not be relabeled as a later generation.

Limits that affect the purchase

Full-model hosting is hardware-intensive. Distilled variants can have different upstream terms; current hosted services may use newer models. Weights have no subscription fee; third-party chat, API calls and self-hosting resources are separate. Local inference and hosted APIs depend on the exact model and provider; the old ChatLLM price is not a current R1 API rate.

What the existing demonstration shows

The recording tries a marble-under-a-glass question and constrained apple-ending sentences in ChatLLM, then compares outputs with o1. The retained recording was published 2025-01-22T02:24:15-08:00. Its public description and chapters support this account; no new transcript or frame audit, product test, purchase or benchmark was performed. Current offers are researched separately. Check the recording for the exact steps and commercial context. See the retained Kingy demonstration.

Sources and buying-review date

Buying details checked October 22, 2026. Plan research uses current official sources; demonstration descriptions use the retained Kingy record and any captured creator chapters. No new subscription, paid generation or checkout was performed. The buying-review date does not renew every claim in the broader facts ledger.

Check official plans · Compare related workflows

Earlier profile and dated source history

The earlier record below keeps its own dates and scope.

DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero, open reasoning models with distilled variants based on Qwen and Llama models.

Alternatives

View alternatives page

Launch History

AI Open-Weight Models

DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model

DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero, open reasoning models with distilled variants based on Qwen and Llama models.

Recheck due Free: Yes API: Yes Open: Yes
Beginner-friendlyBusiness-friendlyDeveloper-friendlyGitHub traction
Launch readiness
7.5 / 10
Demo evidence
Not scored yet
Creator-story fit
Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric

These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.

Launch readiness

How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.

Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.

Demo evidence

Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.

Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.

Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.

Creator-story fit

Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.

Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.

Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.

Scale
0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
Assigned by
Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
Rubric and check date
Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
Confidence and missing data
Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
Freshness
Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
Disputes
Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.

DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and R1-Zero, open reasoning models with distilled variants based on Qwen and Llama, under an MIT-licensed repository (github.com). By the record's…

Kingy coverage

Kingy AI articles about DeepSeek-R1, newest first.

  1. NewsPushing the Frontier: OpenAI’s o3-mini and the Strategic Influence of DeepSeek R1
  2. NewsDeepSeek R1 Shakes the AI Industry: The Threat of Commoditization to Future Foundation Models
  3. NewsThe Blue Whale of Open Weights: How DeepSeek R1 and Others Are Commoditizing the Foundation Layer of AI
  4. NewsAMD Reveals How to Optimize Deepseek R1 on Ryzen AI & Radeon GPUs for Maximum Performance
  5. NewsDeepSeek R1 Explodes Onto the Scene—And So Does Jevon’s Paradox
  6. NewsDeepSeek R1’s Seamless Integration into ChatLLM Teams: A High-Octane, High-Perplexity Exploration
  7. NewsDeepseek R1 vs. OpenAI o3: Do These AI Models Generalize OOD Data