AI Tool Profile

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B-it downloadable weights for local language and multimodal workflows.

Before you buy

Best for: Creators with suitable local hardware who value editable deployment and can test the exact quantization.

Price: Canada/CAD: C$0 Apache-2.0 weights; local or rented compute separate

Included: Apache-2.0 weights permit local deployment subject to their notices. Model files, tokenizer/projector choices and a compatible runtime must still be assembled.

Main limits: That tool-call score did not carry over to reliable iterative coding. Memory was higher than Qwen and one long-context cache configuration initially failed.

What Kingy showed: The audited August 16 local report records 90/90 declared single-tool calls, 30/30 multi-step calls and 19/20 vision cases for its pinned Gemma artifact.

Buying details checked 2026-10-22 with region and currency stated above. Historical demonstrations and the broader fact ledger keep their own dates.

Check official plans · See the demonstration and disclosure · Compare these workflows

Detailed profileModelNo profile check date recorded

Coverage describes this profile, not a product score or a current price guarantee.

Kingy AI Product Facts

Unknown

Current statusUnknown

Company
Not yet reviewed
Primary job
Not yet reviewed
Audience
Not yet reviewed
Evidence
Not yet verified
Latest source check
Unknown
See all tracked product factsPricing, platforms, dependencies, data claims, regions, and timeline

Sources and checks

Coverage
0 of 87 tracked fields currently verified
Sources
0

Source-check dates apply to the tracked facts. Editorial updates elsewhere on this page may have a different date.

Plans and pricing units

Not yet structured in this Kingy record.

Where it runs

Availability
Not yet reviewed

Stack and integrations

Model / provider dependencies
Not yet reviewed
Integrations
Not yet reviewed

Data and regions

Vendor data-use claim
Not yet reviewed
Vendor retention claim
Not yet reviewed
Regions
Not yet reviewed

Launch and latest material update

Launch
Not yet reviewed
Latest material update
Not yet reviewed
Review history
  1. Gemma 4 31B — Product event recorded

    Kingy published an approved update for a sourced product event.

    View published revision
Technical evidence and revision history
Embed “Facts tracked by Kingy”

This label is not a security certification, audit, or product endorsement. It reports the facts Kingy currently supports and when they were last checked.

Which plan is worth considering

Canada/CAD: C$0 Apache-2.0 weights; local or rented compute separate. Apache-2.0 weights permit local deployment subject to their notices. Model files, tokenizer/projector choices and a compatible runtime must still be assembled.

Limits that affect the purchase

That tool-call score did not carry over to reliable iterative coding. Memory was higher than Qwen and one long-context cache configuration initially failed. No model subscription is required to run the weights; hardware, memory, power and hosted-provider charges remain separate. Serving through an API requires a compatible inference runtime. Quantizer and projector revisions are part of the configuration, not interchangeable file labels.

What the existing demonstration shows

The audited August 16 local report records 90/90 declared single-tool calls, 30/30 multi-step calls and 19/20 vision cases for its pinned Gemma artifact. The October 13 archive audit reconstructed 1,200 scored records and matched 318 retained statistics. It audited the historical run, not current weights or a new execution. This describes the dated retained Kingy record, not a new product test. See the retained Kingy demonstration.

Sources and buying-review date

Buying details checked October 22, 2026. Plan research uses current official sources; demonstration descriptions use the retained Kingy record and any captured creator chapters. No new subscription, paid generation or checkout was performed. The buying-review date does not renew every claim in the broader facts ledger.

Check official plans · Compare related workflows

Alternatives

View alternatives page

Launch History

No structured launch records are linked to this tool yet.