AI Tool Profile
GPT-Rosalind
GPT-Rosalind is OpenAI’s model for life-sciences research across biological evidence, data and approved scientific tools. OpenAI says the model has left research preview for eligible organizations through trusted access; approved API use is limited to internal research tools and workflows, excluding customer-facing products and external commercial applications. Rosalind Workbench remains a separate research preview.
Before you buy
Best for: Qualified life-sciences organizations and public-benefit teams working on biological reasoning, evidence synthesis, data analysis, and scientific workflows.
Price: USD trusted-access API pricing; approval required
Included: GPT-Rosalind for eligible life-sciences research organizations.
Main limits: The free research-preview period is over. Internal-use restrictions and eligibility remain; request the applicable rate card before committing.
What Kingy showed: Related coverage: How to Use Gemini Deep Research: Sources, Plans and Report Checks. This review does not treat that article as a new test of this exact model, plan or current release.
Buying details checked 2026-10-23 with region and currency stated above. Historical demonstrations and the broader fact ledger keep their own dates.
Check official plans · See the demonstration and disclosure · Compare these workflows
Coverage describes this profile, not a product score or a current price guarantee.
Verification & Sources
- Evidence state
- Recheck due
- Source links
- 2
- Freshness
- Needs recheck: checked July 14, 2026
- Last updated
- October 23, 2026
What this evidence state means
- Definition
- The claim was previously checked, but its review window expired or a material change may have invalidated it.
- Required provenance
- The prior evidence and check date are retained, together with the expiry or change signal that triggered recheck.
- Owner
- Kingy freshness queue owner and assigned editorial reviewer
- Freshness rule
- This is already outside its freshness rule. It must not be presented as current until reviewed against current evidence.
- Disputes and corrections
- Use “Suggest a correction” on the record. Kingy editorial reviews the cited evidence, records material corrections, and changes or removes the state when it is not supported.
Key source checks
Suggest a correction
Who should consider it
Qualified life-sciences organizations and public-benefit teams working on biological reasoning, evidence synthesis, data analysis, and scientific workflows. GPT-Rosalind is OpenAI’s model for life-sciences research across biological evidence, data and approved scientific tools. OpenAI says the model has left research preview for eligible organizations through trusted access; approved API use is limited to internal research tools and workflows, excluding customer-facing products and external commercial applications. Rosalind Workbench remains a separate research preview.
Plan, price and billing scope
USD trusted-access API pricing; approval required. GPT-Rosalind for eligible life-sciences research organizations. Prices use the currency and billing term stated here. Where a numeric rate, region or current entitlement could not be verified, it remains explicit; no checkout was completed.
Limits that affect the decision
The free research-preview period is over. Internal-use restrictions and eligibility remain; request the applicable rate card before committing.
What the existing evidence shows
Related coverage: How to Use Gemini Deep Research: Sources, Plans and Report Checks. This review does not treat that article as a new test of this exact model, plan or current release. Related workflow reading; not a demonstration of this exact product. Read the related article.
Sources and buying-review date
Buying review completed October 23, 2026. This is a source-based buying assessment. No paid product test, new generation, checkout or performance benchmark was performed. Vendor descriptions and historical examples remain distinct from independently measured results. The date does not renew the broader canonical fact ledger.
- Official source: developers.openai.com
- Official source: openai.com
- Official source: chatgpt.com
- Related Kingy coverage
Check the official offer · Compare related options
Earlier profile, sources and dates
This older record retains its original scope. Current buying qualifications above take precedence where terms have changed.
GPT-Rosalind is OpenAI’s purpose-built model for life-sciences research, designed to reason across biology, scientific evidence, data, and approved research tools.
The Kingy Brief
Get The Kingy Brief.
AI changes, original tests and one practical thing to try. Fridays at 09:00 Vancouver time.
Free · Double opt-in · Unsubscribe anytime
Sign up for The Kingy Brief on Beehiiv.
Signup help and newsletter schedule
Signup form provided by Beehiiv. After submitting, check your inbox for "Confirm your subscription to The Kingy Brief" and open its confirmation link. Check Spam or Promotions if you cannot find it.
Fridays at 09:00 Vancouver time: source-checked AI changes, original tests and one practical thing to try. We skip a week when there is not enough verified material. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alternatives
Tool Links
Related Kingy Links
Launch History
OpenAI updates GPT-Rosalind with new agentic scientific capabilities
OpenAI introduced new GPT-Rosalind capabilities aimed at improving biological reasoning, bioinformatics, and autonomous scientific workflows.
- Launch readiness
- 5.7 / 10
- Demo evidence
- Not scored yet
- Creator-story fit
- Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric
These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.
Launch readiness
How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.
Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.
Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.
Demo evidence
Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.
Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.
Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.
Creator-story fit
Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.
Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.
Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.
- Scale
- 0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
- Assigned by
- Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
- Rubric and check date
- Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
- Confidence and missing data
- Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
- Freshness
- Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
- Disputes
- Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.
OpenAI introduced new GPT-Rosalind capabilities aimed at biological reasoning, bioinformatics, and autonomous scientific workflows. That June 3, 2026 announcement is historical launch context. Its…
Introducing GPT-Rosalind for life sciences research
OpenAI introduced GPT-Rosalind, a purpose-built frontier reasoning model for biology, drug discovery, translational medicine, and scientific workflows.
- Launch readiness
- 6.4 / 10
- Demo evidence
- Not scored yet
- Creator-story fit
- Not scored yet
Score definitions and rubric
These are launch-record readiness heuristics, not product ratings.
Launch readiness
How complete and reviewable the launch record is, not the quality of the product.
Inputs and weights: Launch date 15%; qualifying source 10%; what launched 10%; demo 15%; category 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%; traction evidence 10%; creator or audience fit 10%.
Evidence inputs: Reviewed launch metadata, public source links, demo links, taxonomy, audience, editorial notes, and recorded traction signals.
Demo evidence
Whether the record contains useful, reviewable demonstration evidence; it is not a rating of product output quality.
Inputs and weights: Working demo URL 45%; video walkthrough 25%; clear description of what launched 10%; audience 10%; editorial assessment 10%.
Evidence inputs: Demo and video URLs plus the reviewed launch description, audience, and editorial notes.
Creator-story fit
Whether a launch has enough demonstrable evidence and audience relevance for a useful creator story; it does not predict views or guarantee coverage.
Inputs and weights: Demo evidence 25%; visual creator category 15%; audience 15%; editorial assessment 15%; traction evidence 10%; pricing clarity 10%; API or open-weight evidence 10%.
Evidence inputs: Reviewed demo, category, audience, editorial, traction, pricing, API, and open-weight fields.
- Scale
- 0.0–10.0. A present qualifying input receives its published weight; a missing input receives zero. Scores are rounded to one decimal.
- Assigned by
- Suggested by the deterministic field-completeness helper and assigned or approved by a Kingy editorial reviewer.
- Rubric and check date
- Rubric version P0-2026-08-10. The record’s “Last verified” date is the score check date. Checked: 2026-06-08.
- Confidence and missing data
- Confidence depends on source completeness. “Not scored yet” means no reviewed value; “Needs review” means the value or score set failed validation.
- Freshness
- Recalculate after a material launch, source, demo, pricing, audience, or traction change and during the record freshness review.
- Disputes
- Use “Suggest a correction” on the record and cite the relevant evidence. Commercial relationships cannot buy or alter a score.
OpenAI introduced GPT-Rosalind for life-sciences research on April 16, 2026. Its September 11 update says the model is out of research preview and available…