General and operations managers and AI

A randomized product-innovation workshop supports bounded proposal-work findings; daily operations management remains untested.

What published evidence shows

General and operations managers oversee daily work, assign duties and direct use of materials and human resources.

Scope: US official occupation description

No measured AI capability finding.

The April 2025 working paper analyzes 776 randomized P&G Commercial and R&D professionals in four individual/team and AI/no-AI conditions. Participants tackled early product-development proposals in a one-day virtual workshop; AI groups received one hour of prompting training.

Scope: External cross-functional product-development proposal work; not an operations-manager experiment

Commercial and R&D participants, not a representative general-operations-manager sample.

One-day workshop and one-hour AI training; limited evidence on extended coordination, repeated revisions or actual operational execution.

Use the April 2025 paper's 776 randomized participants; do not pool with HBS reporting of 791.

Task working time excludes any inference of net organizational savings or staffing effects.

Blinded experts rated proposals. Individuals using AI gained about 0.37 standard deviations in quality and spent 16.4% less task time than individuals without AI; teams using AI spent 12.7% less time against that same individual-without-AI baseline.

Scope: April 2025 paper results and exact baseline; not organizational labor savings

This does not establish that AI replaces a manager, authorizes decisions or completes daily operations.

No general employment or staffing effect follows from these proposal outcomes.

Task boundaries

These are reference tasks and proposed evidence links, not verified AI capability ratings.

What remains unknown

Questions for a real workflow

Choose one bounded proposal or analysis deliverable with defined inputs and approval authority. Measure accepted quality and total setup, review, correction and execution effort separately; never infer labor savings from drafting speed alone.