During the initial render, Curtis asked:

should I publish this?  Is it good for kingy.ai?

Interpretation: request for an editorial suitability judgment, not authorization to publish, revise the scene, or begin a separate article.

Assistant response: suitable as a candid, evidence-led Kingy.ai workflow case study after full film QA; not recommended yet as a flagship cinematic showcase because foliage, glass and props remain visibly simplified. The current public Kingy.ai homepage was read to ground that judgment. No publication or site change occurred, and the initial production task continued.
